<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Aliette de Bodard &#187; diversity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aliettedebodard.com/tag/diversity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aliettedebodard.com</link>
	<description>Writer of Fantasy and Science Fiction</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 16:28:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>SFF as metaphor: aliens, vampires, foreigners and immigrants</title>
		<link>http://aliettedebodard.com/2012/05/08/sff-as-metaphor-aliens-vampires-foreigners-and-immigrants/</link>
		<comments>http://aliettedebodard.com/2012/05/08/sff-as-metaphor-aliens-vampires-foreigners-and-immigrants/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 15:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aliette</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cultures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genre]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aliettedebodard.com/?p=5076</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was going to do a coherent blog post on this, but I just could never find a structure that would work. So I decided to follow twitter advice (thanks to Dave Bretton!), and take a baseball bat to my argumentation. Accordingly and for your reading pleasure, a series of disjointed observations on the use [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was going to do a coherent blog post on this, but I just could never find a structure that would work. So I decided to follow twitter advice (thanks to <a href="https://twitter.com/#!/wyrddrgn">Dave Bretton</a>!), and take a baseball bat to my argumentation. </p>
<p>Accordingly and for your reading pleasure, a series of disjointed observations on the use of aliens and supernatural creatures in SFF:</p>
<p>-When you portray a group of funky-looking people with odd customs who either live on different planets, or try to integrate in a modern human society&#8211;whether you consciously want it or not, you&#8217;re bringing to mind real-life parallels. Namely, respectively non-Western countries (during the colonial era or during the globalisation era, depending on your portrayal), and immigrant communities.<br />
If you don&#8217;t believe me, put side-by-side the following: someone travels to a foreign planet and describes the sights; and someone else (of the somewhat clueless variety) travels to, say, Vietnam or China, and describes what they&#8217;ve seen, and what odd customs those people follow, or what odd things they eat. Or try this one: a group living on the margins of society (or within society but still not integrated), hiding their extent of their difference from a fearful and prejudiced mainstream; and say, the situation of Muslisms in modern-day US. See how broadly similar they are?<br />
<span id="more-5076"></span><br />
-This is then reinforced by choosing to depict, say, specism/racism against your aliens/vampires and basing it (because you have to) on real-life examples. </p>
<p>-This then poses some <i>serious</i> problems, because as a parallel, this suffers from a very deep flaw. Vampires are rightly discriminated against because they feed on blood and kill human people; the fae have wild and dangerous magic and toy with human lives; and aliens really are different species.<br />
Foreigners and immigrants are none of these. They&#8217;re human; they have no special magical powers; and above all, they don&#8217;t make a habit of hunting down human people or drinking their blood. All of these have been used against POCs/minorities at some point: the different species to justify racial classification; the magical powers in what I call the &#8220;mystical East&#8221; clichés (but also in tropes like the Magical Negro or The Native American In Tune With Nature); and the drinking of blood in stuff like <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blood_libel">blood libel</a>.<br />
Making those features <i>literally</i> true for otherworldly creatures, and drawing explicit parallels between treatment of those creatures and the treatment of existing people is hugely problematic. Because the main reason all those treatments are utterly wrong-headed is&#8230; they&#8217;re not true. Foreigners aren&#8217;t magically different species. </p>
<p>-Assuming you&#8217;re depicting racial prejudice against said creatures&#8211;the other reason it&#8217;s problematic is that it&#8217;s very often accompanied by a total lack of actual prejudice against actual foreigners. Aka the &#8220;we have solved this stuff already&#8221; fallacy. I find it disturbing to assume that in an alternate New York City that reads like today&#8217;s New York City with added magic, people can be so outspoken against vampires/werewolves/etc., and not have prejudice against Hispanics, Blacks, Asians, LGBT people&#8230; Bonus point for UFs in which the vampires/fae/werewolves remain a secret community, and people who don&#8217;t know about the existence of such communities are still not racist&#8230; Yeah, like that&#8217;s a realistic depiction of the world.<br />
Equally puzzling is that in the far future, humanity will magically have become this homogeneous mass that has let go of cultural conflicts. Honestly, so far we&#8217;ve shown remarkable capacity to pick new sets of prejudices as our immediate spheres became larger and larger (first communities and villages, then countries; and now the world, to an extent and with problems [1]): I can&#8217;t imagine why we wouldn&#8217;t continue doing this as mankind spreads to other planets!</p>
<p>-The specific comparison of UF supernatural creatures to immigrants and minorities is also problematic because in many books, it ends up putting such a high value on &#8220;normal&#8221; society (by which read heterosexual, White and American)&#8211;even more so than if it was just immigrants trying to fit in. It&#8217;s&#8230; something like this: when even immortal vampires, fairies, etc. feel so good about US high schools or US cities that all they really want to do is join in the fun, you basically have a narrative that reinforces the superiority of the &#8220;normative&#8221; society over all other expressions (sure, sometimes this is depicted as something enforced through lack of choice [2], but by and large the Fae/vampires do a surprisingly good job of fitting into human society). The pinnacle of achievement becomes joining a biology class in high school (I&#8217;m looking at <i>you</i>, Twilight): the centre of the world is humans and their values, and not the other way around. Now replace &#8220;humans&#8221; with &#8220;White male&#8221; (or dominant paradigm), and &#8220;fae&#8221; with POC/LGBT/etc. See how problematic it all becomes? </p>
<p>-Bonus points: the handling of &#8220;mixed-race&#8221; people. Those include alien/human crossbreeds (though these are rare); supernatural creatures/human crossbreeds, and the odd ones out like changelings, humans raised by aliens. I have <i>yet</i> to find a book that doesn&#8217;t make a huge splattering mess of things.<br />
A couple of things not to do (and that I&#8217;ve seen in books!): mixed-race people aren&#8217;t suicidal or depressive because they hover on the cusp of two cultures. They&#8217;re also seldom in a position to actually draw little boxes and list their habits and physical traits, and separate them into mother&#8217;s stuff/father&#8217;s stuff. Except in <i>very</i> specific cases, sentences like &#8220;he had the beautiful exotic features of his father, but his true beauty came from his German mother&#8221; are not only racist as heck, but also quite unrealistic. And uh, not every mixed-race child will end up making an explicit choice of their father&#8217;s side or their mother&#8217;s side at the expense of everything else (I&#8217;m somewhat wondering, though, how much that is true in the US, which seems to have an odd elusion of mixed-race identity. If you&#8217;re mixed Chinese and White, you seem to magically become Chinese or White, but you can&#8217;t be both. Can someone from the US confirm or infirm that?).  </p>
<p>Also. Wow. Now that I&#8217;m looking at the whole list I&#8217;m becoming quite depressed about some aspects of genre. I think I need a stiff tea&#8230;</p>
<p>Feel free to comment/discuss/disagree below, I&#8217;m off to write some novel chapters&#8230;</p>
<hr />
[1] Aka: globalisation and the disparity of power it brings, but that&#8217;s a whole other blog post!<br />
[2] The encroachment of humanity on, say, fae lands goes back to one of the points above: it presents an explicit parallel between Fae and Native populations, which does two things. One, it presents colonisation and expropriation as pretty much inevitable, and narratively-sanctioned. Two&#8211;remember the &#8220;Native Americans are Magical Beings in Tune with Nature&#8221; fallacy? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://aliettedebodard.com/2012/05/08/sff-as-metaphor-aliens-vampires-foreigners-and-immigrants/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thursday linkage: diversity in fiction, plus misc.</title>
		<link>http://aliettedebodard.com/2011/07/07/thursday-linkage-diversity-in-fiction-plus-misc/</link>
		<comments>http://aliettedebodard.com/2011/07/07/thursday-linkage-diversity-in-fiction-plus-misc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 20:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aliette</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cooking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feminisim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[world sf]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aliettedebodard.com/?p=3463</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Couple of links: -Joyce Chng at the World SF blog on the Russ Pledge seen from outside the Western Anglophone world. -Jonathan Dotse on why the future isn&#8217;t Western -And two from Cheryl Morgan: one crunching data on SF anthologies, and the other on &#8220;Diversity is Hard&#8221;. In other news, Irene Kuo is a genius. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couple of links:<br />
-Joyce Chng at the World SF blog on <a href="http://worldsf.wordpress.com/2011/07/04/monday-original-content-on-the-russ-pledge-by-joyce-chng-singapore/">the Russ Pledge</a> seen from outside the Western Anglophone world.<br />
-Jonathan Dotse on <a href="http://www.acceler8or.com/2011/06/developing-worlds-beyond-the-frontiers-of-science-fiction/">why the future isn&#8217;t Western</a><br />
-And two from Cheryl Morgan: one <a href="http://www.cheryl-morgan.com/?p=11096">crunching data</a> on SF anthologies, and the other on <a href="http://www.cheryl-morgan.com/?p=11105">&#8220;Diversity is Hard&#8221;</a>. </p>
<p>In other news, Irene Kuo is a genius. I&#8217;m down to 6 recipes picked out of her <i>Key to Chinese Cooking</i> (tea eggs, cha siu, white-cut chicken, two broccoli recipes, and the sweet-sour sauce), and they all worked out great. Also, the explanations are really clear on why you should do stuff, and it makes for way easier cooking. </p>
<p>While googling stuff on how to use cornstarch, I found this book: <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0684800012/ref=pd_lpo_k2_dp_sr_1?pf_rd_p=1278548962&#038;pf_rd_s=lpo-top-stripe-1&#038;pf_rd_t=201&#038;pf_rd_i=0684843285&#038;pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&#038;pf_rd_r=125T035PE3WG313DAJRT"><i>On Food and Cooking</i></a> by Harold McGee. Science and cooking? I&#8217;m sold&#8230; (but broke)</p>
<p>Recipe of the day: <a href="http://kitchentigress.blogspot.com/2009/12/carrot-cake-light-moist.html">creative carrot cake</a> (didn&#8217;t have raisins, so chopped up prunes after removing the stones; didn&#8217;t have orange zest, so added Orange Blossom instead; didn&#8217;t have walnuts, so put in pecans. And not entirely sure I had the right quantity of carrots. This could be fun) </p>
<p>Right. Back to the %%% story. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://aliettedebodard.com/2011/07/07/thursday-linkage-diversity-in-fiction-plus-misc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Diversity Statistics</title>
		<link>http://aliettedebodard.com/2009/06/03/diversity-statistics/</link>
		<comments>http://aliettedebodard.com/2009/06/03/diversity-statistics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 20:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aliette</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[math geek]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aliettedebodard.com/?p=507</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Garked from Vylar Kaftan, a rundown of characters in my stories by gender, race, sexual orientation, age, class and ability. I wanted to add religion as well, but faith is quite a different kettle of fish when the gods are allowed to be main characters. I tracked 172 main characters: the arbitrary part of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Garked from <a href="http://www.vylarkaftan.net/2009/06/02/diversity-statistics/">Vylar Kaftan</a>, a rundown of characters in my stories by gender, race, sexual orientation, age, class and ability. I wanted to add religion as well, but faith is quite a different kettle of fish when the gods are allowed to be main characters.</p>
<p>I tracked 172 main characters: the arbitrary part of the selection was choosing whether a character should be included or not. I went with &#8220;has significant part in plot&#8221;, but even that is debatable&#8230; If a character appeared several times (in different stories), I only counted them once.</p>
<p><span id="more-507"></span></p>
<p>In brackets behind, are the same numbers by protagonist (70 all in all)</p>
<p>GENDER</p>
<p>Male:    44.2% (35.7%)<br />
Female: 45.3% (58.6%)<br />
Other:    10.5% (5.7%)</p>
<p>&#8220;Other&#8221; includes mostly asexual gods and aliens.</p>
<p>RACE<br />
Asian:  48.8% (48.5%)<br />
Caucasian:  22.1% (24.3%)<br />
Hispanic: 2.3% (2.9%)<br />
Native American: 15.1% (14.3%)<br />
Unknown: 0.6% (2.9%)<br />
Other: 11.05% (7.1%)</p>
<p>&#8220;Other&#8221; includes gods I couldn&#8217;t classify with a particular origin, machines, and the odd alien or two.</p>
<p>I suspect the main reason there aren&#8217;t more Native American characters, ie Aztecs, is that I have a bunch of series in there and counted those characters only once. Also, I haven&#8217;t thrown in either of my two novels, both of which are packed to the gills with Aztecs, Mayas and Incas.</p>
<p>Also, it&#8217;s very rare that a human protagonist has no race whatsoever; I was never very good at defaulting to no culture. (&#8220;Caucasian&#8221; includes Greeks, Frenchmen, Scots, Spaniards&#8230;)</p>
<p>SEXUAL ORIENTATION<br />
Straight: 49.4% (58.6%)<br />
Unknown: 41.2% (35.7%)<br />
GLBT: 7 4.1% (2.9%)<br />
Other: 8 4.7% (2.9%)</p>
<p>&#8220;Other&#8221; includes those for whom sex is either totally irrelevant (machines), or proceeding from a different logic  (aliens, some gods).</p>
<p>The astonishing of people without any sexual orientation whatsoever is mainly due to the fact that sex and/or relationships tend to be a faraway preoccupation for most of my characters. Even when I put &#8220;straight&#8221;, I often did so because the person was married to someone of the opposite gender.</p>
<p>AGE<br />
0-17:  15.7% (18.6%)<br />
18-35: 24.4% (37.1%)<br />
36-65: 30.2% (24.3%)<br />
66+:     2.3% (2.9%)<br />
Varies:  3.5% (4.3%)<br />
Other: 23.8%  (11.4%)  <em></em></p>
<p>&#8220;Other&#8221; includes various catergoris of ageless beings (machines, gods and other immortals or long-lived people). I converted everything to a &#8220;modern&#8221; scale: ie, a fifty-year-old Aztec was already a very old man (I used typical lifespans to normalise everything).  <em></em></p>
<p>CLASS<br />
Ruling Class: 12.2% (8.6%)<br />
Upper Class: 18.6% (20.0%)<br />
Middle Class: 29.1% (37.1%)<br />
Working Class: 16.3% (24.3%)<br />
Varies: 2.9% (2.9%)<br />
Other: 20.9% (7.1%)</p>
<p>I limited this to human characters, given how few aliens and machines I had. I suspect I could have assigned a social class to every robot and every alien around, depending on their place within the pecking order of the universe, but I was tired of crunching numbers&#8230;</p>
<p>Like Vy, I was surprised at how easy this was, based on occupation and resources. Also surprised at how many rulers I have going around; I thought there would be much fewer of them, since I dislike writing about the higher spheres of power.</p>
<p>ABILITY<br />
Able: 84.9% (92.9%)<br />
Disabled: 15.1% (7.1%)</p>
<p>Those are mostly mental problems.</p>
<p>Interesting stats: clearly,  there are some lacks in the sexual orientation department (actually, in the sex/romance department full stop). And I must put older characters in my fiction.</p>
<p>(I would say putting in more different races would be nice, but given that I have to research a culture to death before I feel confident enough to include a character from it, I think I&#8217;ll stick to improving my Chinese, Vietnamese and Indians before I move on to other things).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://aliettedebodard.com/2009/06/03/diversity-statistics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

